And she wonders why other nations refuse to give up their nuclear arms!!!

Greetings,

According to the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty to which America is a signature ….Nations who are not nuclear powers are to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and not build nuclear arms. This is what America keeps hammering home when it comes to those she deems a threat to her desired will.

In that same piece of paper though, it also stipulates that the signees of the document who have nuclear arms are supposed to disarm immediately. Has America and other nuclear powers done so? It not, then how can they demand of others what they refuse to do themselves?

Isn’t this hypocrisy? If America, the only open user of these violent and destructive weapons, deem them necessary for her policy and national security, why then does North Korea or accused nations such as Iran have to give them up or forgo them?

Is it because America would like the world unarmed to force her will over the nations? We know that it’s harder to control, demand, and bully those who possess the same type of weapons the bully possesses. This is what is enraging America.

Having a whole arsenal of thousands of these destructive weapons, she is in fear that others my acquire one or two. Why? She fears retaliation for her evil over the decades and years. She knows that she would not be able to easily force others to bow if they possess what she possesses.

US to spend $1 trillion to revitalize its aging nuclear arsenal: Report

The US will spend $1 trillion to revitalize its ageing nuclear arsenal: Report

The United States plans to spend more than $1 trillion to revitalize its antiquated nuclear arsenal over the next three decades, according to a new report.

The Obama administration has dedicated a “sprawling new plant” in Kansas City, Mo.–bigger than the Pentagon– to modernize “the aging weapons that the United States can fire from missiles, bombers and submarines,” The New York Times reports.

The Kansas City National Security Campus is part of a “wave of atomic revitalization that includes plans for a new generation of weapon carriers,” the report said.

The new project, which will leave most of the US nuclear arsenal intact, is in stark contrast to President Barack Obama’s campaign promise in 2008 of “a nuclear-free world.”

Instead, because of “political deals and geopolitical crises,” the Obama administration is overseeing an extensive modernization of its atomic arsenal while implementing only modest arms reductions, the Times said.

Gary Samore, Obama’s top nuclear adviser in his first term, said that Russia’s actions in Ukraine were a major factor. “That has made any measure to reduce the stockpile unilaterally politically impossible.”

The United States and Russia last year agreed to reduce their tactical nuclear weapons, but the deal is unlikely to complete after the recent tensions between the two countries over the crisis in Ukraine.

Congressional hawks believe that the new plan will put the United States in a “stronger position if a new arms race breaks out” and hope the renovated nuclear plants could allow the US arsenal to “expand rapidly” under a different president, according to the report.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Hiram's 1555 Blog